Zack Fleishman vs Norman Tam Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Fleishman 1 - 0 Tam

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fleishman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tam has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fleishman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tam has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Fleishman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tam has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Fleishman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tam winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Fleishman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 21/ 25). Tam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fleishman winning 1 times and Tam being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fleishman winning 2 and Tam winning 0. The last match between Fleishman and Tam was at the Countrywide Classic - Los Angeles, 22-07-2006, Q1 round, Hard with Zack Fleishman getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Fleishman and Tam have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fleishman winning 0 times and Tam 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fleishman winning 0, and Tam 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fleishman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tam has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fleishman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tam has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Fleishman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tam has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)